from the report of the Justice Liberhan. Commission of Enquiry on the circum stances leading up to the demolition of the. Babri Masjid on 6 December Justice M.S. Liberhan submits the one-man Commission report, which probed the demolition of the Babri Majid on December 6, , to Prime. This is the key finding of the nearly page-long report of the one-man Liberhan Commission on the catastrophic events of December 6.
|Published (Last):||13 April 2016|
|PDF File Size:||19.91 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.42 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The senior BJP leader further alleged that the government wanted to divert commissikn from the opposition from its plan of raising Madhu Koda and 2G Spectrum allocation scams in Parliament.
Without mentioning whether he was referring to the Kalyan Singh -led-BJP government in power in Uttar Pradesh or the Congress regime at Centre then, he said he was present at Ayodhya and wanted to construct the Ram Temple at an undisputed place but they could not do so as the government men demolished Babri Mosque on 6 December It was a spontaneous act of anger by people,” Madhav added.
The probe panel was one of the costliest commissions having spent nearly Rs eight crore. Kalyan Singhwho was the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh during the mosque’s demolition, was lliberhan criticized in the report. Vajpayee, Prime Minister in the BJP-led National Democratic Alliancewas not present on 6 December when the mosque was brought down, but the report says it cannot be assumed that Vajpayee, Advani and others did not commissino of the designs of the Sangh Parivar.
Police had inputs about attack on Babri Mosque: The report recommends a law providing for exemplary punishment for misusing religion to acquire political power. Justice Manmohan Singh Liberhan reserves the brunt of his searing commentary for then Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Kalyan Singh, under whose watch the 16th century mosque met its calamitous end: The contents of reprt report were not immediately known, PTI said.
He contested Liberhan Commission’s claim that demolition of the Babri Mosque was planned and charged “dilly-dally” by the then government of Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao was responsible for the incident.
Drag according to your convenience. There can be no greater betrayal or crime in a democracy and this Commission has no hesitation in condemning these pseudo-moderates for their sins of omission”. The Liberhan Commission report submitted to the government on 30 June holds a number of people culpable for leading the country to the brink of communal discord.
The report rpeort individual culpability for the demolition on a total of 68 clmmission, the bulk of them drawn from the extended Parivar clan comprising the Rashtriya Swayam Commisskon Sangh, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, the Bajrang Dal and the BJP. The author, a former Intelligence Bureau Joint Director, Maloy Krishna Dhar in his book “Open Secrets-India’s intelligence unveiled” pointed out that the blue print for demolition of the mosque was drawn in a meeting held in February attended by leaders of the extremist Hindu groups.
It was a day of angry exchanges ligerhan parliament, and cries of “Shame, shame! Our agitation echoed the sentiment of the people at the time.
In all, the Commission examined one hundred witnesses including. The VHP says the commission failed to make any adverse comment on certain individuals despite observing in para In fact, the Congress should be blamed for the demolition as the Congress-led government had opened the locks of the Ram Mandir, organised the shilanayas of the temple at the controversial site thereby providing a “cushion to Ram sevaks” to demolish the controversial structure, Singh claimed.
The leaders agreed to work together.
There should be a constructive solution. I want Ram Temple, but I didn’t want the mosque to be destroyed that way”. Archived from the original on 9 January He cited the incorrect date of Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination as well as the inclusion of the names of some historians in the report as evidence.
We are not going to apologise. The last extension was in March this year for three months. The Commission,observed, “The blame or the credit for the entire temple construction movement at Ayodhya must necessarily be attributed to the Sangh Parivar”. The first motivation for leaking the report is the unity in opposition on the sugarcane price issue which the government wanted to break.
Roy of Ayodhya also recorded their statements on the demolition. This unity would have continued on price rise and other issues,” Swaraj said.
Archived from the original on 11 May What is the Liberhan Commission? He goes on to say that in a meeting on the previous day,the RSS, VHP, BJP and Shiv Sena leaders there was “silent resoluteness and agreement that Ayodhya offered a unique opportunity to take the Hindutva wave to the peak for deriving political benefit.
Liberham panel had completed hearing the last witness in Use Indian English from August All Wikipedia articles written in Indian English Use dmy dates from August All articles with dead external links Eeport with dead external links from June Articles with permanently dead external links All stub articles. Views Read Edit View history. Please Email the Editor.
Advani Kalyan Singh V.
Four years ago, the hearings of the Commission concluded but not before a controversy broke out with repoet sole Commission’s Counsel Anupam Gupta dissociating himself from it owing to personal differences with Justice Liberhan.
M Libberhan Liberhan, then a sitting judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, was assigned the task of probing the sequence of events that led to the occurrences at the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid complex on December 6,resulting in the destruction of the structure.
I am not apologetic at all, I am willing to be hanged for my role. It accuses RSS of utilizing its large volunteer base to accomplish this task. Earlier, reacting to the report, former BJP leader Uma Bharti, who was in Ayodhya on the day of the demolition, said that the party should come commiwsion over the issue. Togadia asserted the VHP was committed to building a great Ram temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya and was ready to make any sacrifice for achieving this.